My journey began in 2005 when I switched from corporate to education. I was hired at a local charter school. During our orientation, the school CEO said they are a project-based learning school. She showed a video of a project where a student was studying marine life. I was intrigued while watching the video. I thought, "schools really have changed. I like this new way of teaching." After the video ended, the CEO said a few more housekeeping measures and that was it. My only training at that point was a video. Since I was wanting to implement, I asked veteran teachers once school started. I soon discovered that many of the teachers did not teach through projects but in the traditional way. Those who did complete projects where more about cutting and pasting then deeper learning like I saw in the video.
Despite this hit of reality, I was not swayed from my interest in how to do project-based learning. I put my journalism background to use and started researching. It was slightly difficult to find material in 2005 compared to today. However, I quickly found out that PBL had a few names. The most common name was project-based learning however there was also problem-based learning, inquiry-based learning, authentic learning, etc. After reading a few articles, I discovered they were basically the same thing just with different names and styles of delivery. So I moved on to trying to find books that could help me implement the framework in my classroom. The first two books I found were How to Use Problem-Based Learning in the Classroom and a book where students build a city of the future (sorry, I don't remember the name). I remember how excited I was to have these books. The Problem-Based Learning book was great but lacked a step by step process that I was needing. The second book (authored by a teacher who completed it with his students) was a complete step by step. I was so happy to have directions given this was my first year teaching. I was still scared to implement so I tried it with my honors Geometry only.
Well, I wish I can say it was the most beautiful experience ever. Although it was not terrible, it did not have the outcome like the video. The students excitement about the project made me want to continue the journey. Here are my lessons learned from that first year:
- A step-by-step process is more harmful than helpful. I realized that this is a learning experience and following directions is not a learning experience. If I did have steps, I needed to look at those steps as guidance only. What worked for that teacher and his students may not be exactly how I need to do it for my style and my students.
- Work completed at home has varied results. I announced to the students that they were going to build a city of the future. I gave them a sheet that included the parameters and told them it would be due in a couple of weeks. For the next two weeks, class was just like normal with them working at home on the project. I didn't even teach anything that was related to the project. According to the book, this was a way to "check" to see if they got the information previously taught. When two weeks were up, I had an array of "cities". All of them were elaborate but definitely showed signs of only them working on it. I wish I could say this moment made me realize that I should have them work in class. It didn't. I just thought this is the result of projects and some will be good and some not so good. However, it did make me realize the next point.
- Rubrics are a way of helping students know quality and expectations. I realized that I only had parameters not details of expectations. This made grading really hard. Out of guilt, I just gave everyone an "A" for effort. I realized that I probably should use a rubric in the future.
- Limited resources does not mean limited teaching/PBL. My first year of teaching was really interesting. In addition to finding resources to learn PBL, I was trying to figure out how to teach with limited resources. I had one class that did not have textbooks, a 100 copy a month limit, class sets of copies had to be submitted for approval (3 day minimum wait), a whiteboard that didn't wipe off, a teacher desktop computer and an overhead projector (yes, overhead not projector). Although I had almost nothing, I realized that I could teach with little or no resources. I found creative ways to help students learn. This experience made me want to learn more about inquiry and assessment. I wanted to learn if there is a way to incorporate these strategies into PBL.
My first year was a huge learning experience. It gave me a lot of goals to make for my second year. So, please share your first year lessons.
3 comments:
My first year came after 14 years of teaching. I was hired by Manor New Technology High School (a New Tech Network school) that was "100%" PBL. This meant that the goal was for every teacher to work from one project to the next.
A few weeks after being hired, but still during the summer, I was hired by our regional education service center to create a dozen PBL units for Geometry and they had to be created using the 5E model. (Side note: These lessons are still available to teachers today).
The New Tech Network taught a 4-day PBL 101 style class for new teachers and used BIE's Handbook as it's reference. I still use that book today.
And so my first year was miserable. I felt like a total loser and the word inept comes to mind. But I learned to shift from what I call Cook Book teaching with each project following a "recipe," to a more inquiry based classroom and by the end of the year I could see that PBL was possible.
Thanks so much for your comment Chris. You had what I call "baptism by fire" experience. I too can identify with feeling like a loser. Mine lasted for at least three years. Now, I just have loser moments.
I sometimes wonder if full immersion is best way to get teachers to do PBL or if we should graduate them through the process. I don't know if my slow decent into PBL was best or if I had to do more I would be further along today. Everyone, what do you think?
My journey to PBL is somewhat familiar and yet foreign. As a veteran teacher of 14 years I was looking for change. My district recruited me to be a member of something new called the TSTEM academy. I was intrigued and nervous but being one never to shy away from a challenge, I was all in. As we began to prepare for the opening of this academy we were introduced to PBL and attended a 5 day training with the same BIE handbook that I still use today. As the year came closer, I began to plan with my history teacher and create my first project that centered around the research process (which seemed like a safe place). My fears were the same as all the teachers I train today. Will this work? Will my content suffer? Will my evaluator understand what I am trying to do? Can I relinquish control for the sake of student voice and choice? As all of those questions swirled in the air like juggling plates I took the plunge and waited for them to all come crashing down around me a la a Greek Festival. There were bumps, bruised egos, tears, and revision but along the way something happened. I overheard a student say-we need to learn how to do this research thing right-I have a feeling we will use it forever. The moment of teacher utopia had arrived and I was sold. As I have grown and now entered the next part of my PBL journey as a Facilitator in the New Tech Network and as a National Faculty member of the Buck Institute for Education, I am reminded of Natalie's aha moment and the idea that what we teach is relevant to our students' world, which was all facilitated by PBL. I have learned to let things go, revise and revisit often, make connections, and examine the world for learning and teaching moments. All of these are the tools of the PBL practitioner. It was well worth the leap of faith.
Post a Comment